Capping machinery · compare the range
Explore capping machines for different closures and container formats. Share your cap, bottle or jar details and required output to compare suitable capping machinery.
Compare before you enquire
Filter by production setup or search the specifications. Leave either field open if you are not sure yet.
Automatic
Pneumatic inline screw capping for spray and pump bottles. LUXG16 handles caps 18–70 mm and bottles 20–160 mm at 20–60 bottles/min with stable, adjustable torque.
Benchtop / manual
Automatic dropper and nail‑polish bottle capper with vibratory bowl sorter. Imitates a human hand to place caps gently, then tightens with four rubber wheels for a smooth finish.
Benchtop / manual
Space‑saving capper for sprays and screw caps. LUXG1870‑class machine handles caps 18–70 mm, bottles 60–270 mm high at ~20–40 bottles/min.
Benchtop / manual
Compact bench capper for 10–50 mm closures. Delivers controlled torque and can press tamper bands/security rings while capping.
Semi-automatic
Desktop semi‑automatic capper with automatic bottle clamping. Covers 20–60 mm caps with manual/auto modes and stable, precise torque control.
Benchtop / manual
Portable electric capper with adjustable clutch for 10–50 mm caps. Ideal for startups, rework stations, and low‑volume production.
Automatic
High‑speed inline screw capping for round plastic bottles. LUXG440B uses guided side‑belt transport and optional cap elevator to achieve 3000–5000 BPH.
Semi-automatic
Pneumatic perfume spray and collar-ring crimping with interchangeable heads. Handles FEA 13–20 mm sizes and adjustable bottle heights for fast, repeatable sealing.
Automatic
Inline pilfer‑proof (ROPP) capping for glass bottles. LUXG440Z removes the rotary table for straight‑line handling and adds bottleneck support for delicate containers.
Benchtop / manual
Semi‑automatic ROPP capping machine for spirits and wine. Compact bench unit produces tight, pilfer‑proof finishes.
Semi-automatic
Bench‑top ROPP cap crimping machine for wine and spirits. Interchangeable heads handle common aluminium pilfer‑proof caps.
Automatic
Automatic linear T‑cork press for wine & spirits. LUXG16D2 uses a customised pressing head and optional vibratory bowl to insert T‑corks at 20–60 bottles/min.
Benchtop / manual
Desktop T‑cork pressing machine for liquor and wine bottles. Automatically orients (optional bowl), positions and presses T‑corks into glass bottles with consistent force—ideal for gin, vodka, whisky and.
Automatic
Fully automatic crown cap press for beer and soda bottles. LUXG440E feeds caps, separates bottles, presses and crimps crowns for a secure seal at up to 2000 bottles/hour.
Automatic
Automates cap feeding, steam injection and vacuum sealing to create airtight, hygienic closures on twist‑off caps. Ideal for sauces, jams and hot‑fill products.
| Machine | Output | Cap diameter | Heads | Guide price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automatic Screw Capping Machine (Spray & Pump) | 20–60 bottles/min | 18–70 mm | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Compact Dropper Screw Capper | 20–40 bottles/min (format‑dependent) | 18–70 mm | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Compact Screw Capping Machine | ≈ 20–40 bottles/min | 18–70 mm | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Desktop Screw Capper | 20–40 bottles/min (format‑dependent) | 10–50 mm (customisable) | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Semi Automatic Screw Capping Machine | 20–60 bottles/min (format‑dependent) | 20–60 mm (custom up to 90 mm) | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Handheld Screw Capper | ≈30–90 bottles/min (operator‑dependent) | 10–50 mm (kits include 28–32 and 38 mm rings) | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Automatic Belt (Spindle) Screw Capping Machine | 3000–5000 BPH | Model dependent | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Semi Automatic Crimping Machine | ≈800–1000 bottles/hour | Perfume spray heads, collar rings (FEA sizes) | Pneumatic, air‑pressure controlled | Quoted to specification |
| Automatic ROPP Capping Machine | ≈ 1000 BPH | φ25–38 mm | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Compact ROPP | See model specification | Aluminium ROPP | Per cap diameter | Quoted to specification |
| Semi Automatic ROPP Capping Machine | See model specification | Aluminium ROPP | Select per cap diameter | Quoted to specification |
| Automatic T‑Cork Press Capping Machine | 20–60 bottles/min | Customised | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Compact Desktop T‑Cork Press | ≈ 15–30 bottles/min (cork/bottle dependent) | T‑corks / press‑fit corks | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Automatic Crown Capping Machine | ≈ 2000 bottles/hour | Customised | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
| Automatic Twist‑Off Steam Vacuum Capping Machine | ≈ 4,800–9,000 bottles/hour | Twist‑off / lug caps | Model dependent | Quoted to specification |
Send us your product and pack details and we will help narrow the range.
Cap type, container stability, closure dimensions and required tightening control affect equipment selection. A change of cap or container may require different handling or tooling.
Use the existing range cards to compare options, then discuss the application with the Lancing team. Capacity and compatibility depend on the machine and application.
Send your closure type, cap and container dimensions, product details and target output. Photos or samples help clarify handling requirements.
Integration depends on machine heights, transfer arrangements, controls and the product flow. Share the existing line layout for review.
Speak with an engineer
Tell us what you are packaging and the output you need. We will use the page reference to route your enquiry to the right machinery specialist.
Identify whether the closure is screwed, crimped, rolled, pressed or otherwise applied, and send the final container and closure together. For pumps, triggers and droppers, include the complete assembly rather than the cap shell alone. The handling requirement before tightening or application can be as important as the closing step itself.
Agree the required finished condition and how it is checked. Distinguish secure application, tamper features and any final orientation requirement. Ask each proposal to state the manual loading, feeding and inspection work included so different automation levels can be compared fairly.
No. Closure mechanism, thread or finish, container support, component presentation and the required finished result must also be assessed.
